Evidence Hub

Is meropenem MIC increase against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae correlated with increased resistance rates against other antimicrobials with Gram-negative activity?

Cojutti P, Sartor A, Bassetti M, Scarparo C, Pea F

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2018

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution for meropenem and other antimicrobials with Gram-negative activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical isolates collected at a tertiary hospital in Italy between 2013-2016.

METHODS: The antimicrobial susceptibility of KPC-Kp strains was tested by the broth microdilution method using customised 96-well plates and the results were interpreted according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations.

RESULTS: Among 169 consecutive KPC-Kp clinical isolates, 45 (26.6%) were susceptible to meropenem (MIC≤2mg/L). Among the 124 meropenem-resistant isolates, 73 (58.9%) had a meropenem MIC between 16-64mg/L. The overall resistance rate for the other antimicrobials tested was very high both for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (99.0%), was moderate for amikacin (37.4%) and was low for gentamicin (11.2%), colistin (8.2%) and tigecycline (7.7%). Aminoglycosides had a dichotomous behaviour in relation to meropenem MIC increase. The resistance rate for gentamicin remained <20% across all meropenem MICs; conversely, that for amikacin increased from <20% in the presence of meropenem MIC≤8mg/L up to ca. 80% in the presence of meropenem MIC≥64mg/L. Resistance rates for tigecycline and colistin remained <20% in the presence of meropenem MICs up to 64mg/L.

CONCLUSION: The overall susceptibility rates of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free