Evidence Hub

Differences and trends in pathogens between ventilator-associated pneumonia and non-ventilator-associated pneumonia: data from 61 hospitals in Suzhou, China, 2020-2024

Yang J, Song X, Wang Y, Zhang J, Jin M

BMJ open, 2026

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the differences in pathogenic bacterial profiles between ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) and to provide data to support clinical infection prevention and control.

Design: A retrospective observational study using surveillance data, accompanied by a statistical analysis of pathogen-related variables between the two study cohorts.

Setting: Sixty-one secondary and tertiary healthcare institutions in a single city. Data were extracted from the city's regional healthcare-associated infection surveillance platforms.

Participants: Inpatients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with confirmed hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), including VAP and NV-HAP, at the aforementioned 61 healthcare institutions during the study period. Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were excluded.

Outcome measures: (1) Pathogen distribution in patients with VAP and NV-HAP; (2) temporal trends in pathogen isolation rates (January 2020-December 2024) in both groups; (3) antimicrobial resistancecharacteristics of major pathogens, including detection/composition ratios of key multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs): carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC), carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA); (4) susceptibility of major pathogens to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free