Evidence Hub

Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia During the 2023-2024 European Re-Emergence: Why Severity Does Not Predict Macrolide Resistance

Perugini E, Ferrari L, Iannetta M, Bartolini B, Dimartino V, Favaro M, Fontana C, Sarmati L

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026

Abstract

Background: Following a significant decline during the 2020-2021 SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) experienced a resurgence across Europe in 2023-2024. Although macrolide-resistant MP has increased globally, severe disease can occur even in the absence of resistance, which highlights the importance of rapid molecular characterization for clinical purposes. In this context, clinical severity is often improperly used as a surrogate marker of macrolide resistance, potentially driving unnecessary antibiotic escalation.

Methods: We report a severe MP pneumonia occurring during the 2023-2024 resurgence and evaluate macrolide resistance through a rapid two-step workflow (Real Time-PCR screening for A2063G/A2064G followed by confirmatory 23S rRNA sequencing), to assess whether severity predicts resistance and to support antibiotic stewardship.

Results: The patient developed acute hypoxic respiratory failure (PaO2 54.9 mmHg; P/F ratio 110), extensive centrilobular micronodules on chest CT imaging, significant systemic inflammation and elevated liver enzymes. Respiratory support was escalated from a Venturi mask to a high-flow nasal cannula and BiPAP. MP infection was confirmed by multiplex Real Time-PCR (RT-PCR) and supported by positive IgM/IgG serology. RT-PCR targeting A2063G/A2064G mutations revealed no resistance-associated variants, and Sanger sequencing of an 807 bp 23S rRNA fragment confirmed a wild-type genotype. Despite severe hypoxemic respiratory failure, no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free