Evidence Hub

Non-prescription antibiotic use and its predictors among children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zewdie S, Kassa AA, Yayehrad AT, Bizuneh MM, Ayenew W, Zewudie M, Mulat S, Bitew BE et al.

Italian journal of pediatrics, 2024

80,133 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Globally antibiotics are among the most commonly used drugs. Non-prescription use of antibiotics is a major factor for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance one of the top global public health and development threats. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess non-prescription antibiotic use and predictors among children in Low and middle-income countries.A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted from PubMed, Scopus and HINARI to identify primary studies published between 2000 and 2024. Observational studies conducted among children ≤ 18 years old and published in English language were included in the review. After screening, the studies were assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool and data were extracted using a checklist. Heterogeneity was assessed using forest plot, Chocran's Q Test and I2. The random effects meta-analysis model was employed to pool the prevalence of non-prescription antibiotic use among children in low-and middle-income countries. Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots with Egger's test.The review was conducted among 32 cross-sectional studies with a sample size of 80,133 participants. The pooled prevalence of non-prescription antibiotic use among children in low-and middle-income countries was 38.86% (95% CI 34.32, 43.40; P 2 = 99.38%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 80,133 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free