Evidence Hub

An open-label, randomized comparison of levofloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate plus clarithromycin for the treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Ting‐Yu Lin, Shu‐Min Lin, Hao-Cheng Chen, Chih-Jan Wang, Yu-Min Wang, Min-Li Chang, Chun‐Hua Wang, Chien‐Ying Liu et al.

PubMed, 2007

26 participants · 29 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anti-pneumococcal fluoroquinolone has been used to treat community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) frequently because of its broad antimicrobial spectrum. METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital. Eligible patients were randomized to levofloxacin 500 mg IV q24h followed by 500 mg orally q24h or a combination of amoxicillin/clavulanate 500 mg/100 mg IV q8h with oral clarithromycin 500 mg q12h and then oral amoxicillin/clavulanate 250 mg/125 mg q8h with oral clarithromycin 500 mg q12h for 7-14 days. RESULTS: From July 2004 to February 2006, 50 patients were enrolled (levofloxacin, n = 26; combination therapy, n = 24). The clinical response rate in the clinically evaluable population was similar for both groups (78.3% vs. 77.3%; p = 1.000). Levofloxacin had a higher microbiological response rate overall, and for Gram-negative and non-pseudomonas Gram-negative pathogens than the combination therapy but the difference was not statistically significant (60.0% vs. 38.9%, 55.0% vs. 21.0% and 75.0% vs. 25.0%, respectively). The length of hospital stay was similar for both groups (7.4 +/- 3.1 vs. 6.8 +/- 2.1 days; p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Patients who were admitted to our hospital for CAP were older and had more comorbidities with a much higher incidence of Gram-negative pathogens than in a previous study. Levofloxacin was at least as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanate plus clarithromycin in clinical and microbiological responses.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 26 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free