Evidence Hub

Levofloxacin versus beta-lactamic therapy in community acquired pneumonia that requires hospitalization

Geijo Martínez MP, Díaz de Tuesta Chow-Quan AM, Herranz CR, Gómez Criado C, Dimas Nuñez JF, Saiz García F

Anales de medicina interna (Madrid, Spain : 1984), 2002

49 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and security of levofloxacin treatment in front betalactamic therapy in patient with community-acquired pneumonia that require hospitalization (CAPH).

PATIENT AND METHODS: A prospective and randomized study along a year from 49 patients diagnosed of (CAPH) that were admitted in the Internal Medicine Service. The patients were assigned randomly to receive.-I: cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, II: amoxicillin/clavulanate (both could be associated or not with a macrolide) or III: levofloxacin. It was accomplished Rx. thorax to 7-10 days, to the month and, other reviews if was necessary.

RESULTS: 29 cases were in standard therapy (I or II) and 20 cases received levofloxacin therapy. Male 84%, half age 70.9 years old, 57% with moderate or severe underlying disease, and 55% with approaches of initial severity criteria. In 47% of the cases we arrived to etiologic diagnosis, in the third of the cases were BGN. The cure took place in 94% of the patients and 2 patients died (5%). No differences were observed regarding demographic characteristics, underlying disease and severity. No differences were detected in: the secondary effects, complications, hospital stay or, mean stay or percentage of cures. The necessity to prolong the therapy was bigger in the standard group in front of the group tried with levofloxacin (52% vs. 15%, p:0.02).

CONCLUSIONS: In bigger population and with initial severity the treatment with levofloxacin can be a valid alternative…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free