Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of supervised implementation of an oral health care protocol on ventilator-associated pneumonia patients in intensive care units: a double-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial

Sharareh Karimi, Ensi Kolyaei, P. Karimi, K. Rahmani

Infection Prevention in Practice, 2023

200 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Summary Background The available scientific evidence suggests a significant association between oral bacteria and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Aims The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of an oral health protocol in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Methods In this multi-center RCT, conducted in the intensive care units of neurological patients in three general teaching hospitals of two provinces located in the west of the Iran, a consecutive sample of 200 intubated patients were initially recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to the intervention (received oral health care based on evidence-based oral health protocol) or control (routine oral health care) groups. Both groups received their prescribed treatment regimen for seven consecutive days. The percentage of VAP diagnoses as main outcome assessed using clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS). Findings The rate of VAP in the intervention and control groups was 5% and 64%, respectively. The intervention reduced the risk of VAP by 97% and this difference was statistically significant (P <0.001). The chance of VAP occurrence in patients with lower levels of consciousness in univariate and multivariate analysis was significantly higher (OR: 2.38; 95%CI: 1.11–5.26) P <0.05). Conclusion The results of our study suggest that the use of a dynamic supervised oral health care guideline is more effective than the routinely used protocols in the intensive care…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free