Evidence Hub

Effects of Juhongtanke oral solution on alleviating the symptoms of community-acquired pneumonia: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

Min Liang, Linhui Hu, N. Luo, Hu Lv, Zhihua Chen, Jian-Ling Mo, Mei-Lan Yang, Ying Lin et al.

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2022

272 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: The timely alleviation of symptoms is essential for managing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Juhongtanke oral solution is a traditional marketed Chinese patent medicine believed to ease CAP symptoms. The currently available evidence is based on a few retrospective studies of patients with various types of pneumonia, whereas robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that support this notion are lacking. Material and methods: In this multi-center, prospective RCT, patients were randomly allocated to receive routine treatment alone or a combination of Juhongtanke oral solution (20 mL q8h) for 5 days and maintained for an additional 3-day safety observation period. The primary outcome was Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale (BCSS) score evaluated on day 5. Secondary outcomes included the evaluation of cough and dyspnea items in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from days 1–5, remission rate in BCSS and VAS during the treatment course, and the length of hospitalization and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 272 patients assessed for eligibility, 240 were enrolled in the study (n =120 per group). The mean difference in BCSS evaluated on day 5 was a median 1 point [95%CI (1.00, 2.00)], significantly lower in the treatment group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). Similar results were observed in VAS on day 5, with statistics of a median 2 points [95%CI (1.40, 2.50)] in the cough item and a median 1 point [95%CI (0.50, 2.00)] in the dyspnea item,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 272 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free