Evidence Hub

Randomized trial of AI-assisted chest radiograph triage reducing time-to-antibiotics in suspected pneumonia

Ariba Mumtaz, Muhammad Nasser Javaid, A. Lalwani, Shaikh khalid Muhammad, Muhammad Zakria

First Workshop on Insights from Negative Results in NLP, 2025

140 participants

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia remains a major contributor to emergency department morbidity, and timely administration of antibiotics is a key determinant of outcomes. Conventional radiograph workflows often delay interpretation during high-volume periods, prolonging clinical decision-making. Recent advances in artificial intelligence have enabled automated prioritization of imaging studies, yet evidence from randomized trials assessing its real-time clinical impact remains limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether AI-assisted triage of chest radiographs in the emergency department reduces time-to-antibiotics and improves early clinical outcomes in patients with suspected pneumonia compared with standard workflow.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted over a six-month period, enrolling adult patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of pneumonia who received chest radiographs as part of routine evaluation. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to AI-assisted triage or standard radiograph workflow. The AI system automatically flagged radiographs with suspected infiltrates, prioritizing them for expedited radiologist review. Data collected included baseline demographics, time-to-antibiotics, radiologist report turnaround time, length of stay in the emergency department, and early clinical response at 48 hours using a standardized ordinal scale. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests and chi-square tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 140 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free