Evidence Hub

Characterization of the onset and consequences of pneumonia due to fluoroquinolone-susceptible or -resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Paladino JA, Sunderlin JL, Forrest A, Schentag JJ

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2003

100 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to identify and compare the microbiological and clinical outcomes among hospitalized adults with pneumonia caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible or -resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic regimens used prior to, as well as those used to treat, the infections were characterized.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: This non-randomized multicentre study included 100 consecutively identified patients with pneumonia caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible (n = 50) or fluoroquinolone-resistant (n = 50) strains of P. aeruginosa. Medical records were examined for demographic, clinical and treatment variables including antibiotics received in the 30 days before the index respiratory or blood culture; AUICs were calculated for each patient using reported or derived MICs. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to identify factors associated with successful clinical and microbiological outcomes.

RESULTS: The study population was primarily elderly, frequently in a critical care unit, with low serum albumin and with a high probability of failure and mortality. Patients with pneumonia caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa were more likely to have received antibiotics within 7 days before the infection (P = 0.027); the antibiotic regimen was more likely to be of a weak potency (mean AUIC of 58 versus 169, P = 0.001) and to include levofloxacin (P < 0.0001) than what was administered to patients who became infected with a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free