Evidence Hub

Characteristics of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Romanian Children

Ulmeanu AI, Ciuparu GE, Matran ER

Microorganisms, 2025

63 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Background/objectives: Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae), traditionally associated with mild community-acquired pneumonia in school-aged children, has experienced a delayed resurgence following the COVID-19 pandemic. The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of M. pneumoniae pneumonia in children within the context of this global resurgence have not been well established in Romania.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed children diagnosed with M. pneumoniae pneumonia who were hospitalized in the pulmonology department of "Grigore Alexandrescu" Emergency Hospital for Children in Bucharest from March to December 2024. Clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data were extracted from hospital records. M. pneumoniae infection was confirmed through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) multiplex panel detection or specific IgM antibody levels ≥ 10 AU/mL.

Results: The final analysis included 63 patients who met the inclusion criteria. The cohort's median age [IQR] was 12.6 [8-15] years, with 11.1% (n = 7) under 6 years old. The radiographic findings revealed a predominance of right lung involvement (52.4%, n = 33, p = 0.03) and a significantly higher prevalence of alveolar infiltrates compared to interstitial patterns (88.9%, n = 56, p p = 0.007). Rare extrapulmonary manifestations included meningoencephalitis (1.6%, n = 1) and reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (3.2%, n = 2). Notably, co-infections with other respiratory pathogens did…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 63 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free