Evidence Hub

Healthcare Resource Utilization in Refractory MACLD: Comparison of an Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension (ALIS) Cohort with a Non-ALIS Cohort

Aksamit TR, Waweru C, Welch E, Divinagracia E, Wang P, Markson L

Pulmonary therapy, 2026

116 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Add-on treatment with amikacin liposome inhalation suspension (ALIS) to a multidrug antibiotic regimen is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for adults with refractory Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease (MACLD). In real-world settings, other antibiotics may be added on to treat refractory MACLD. We analyzed healthcare resource utilization in a US patient population who received add-on treatment for refractory MACLD.

Methods: This was a retrospective claims analysis using Merative™ MarketScan® databases (January 2016 to December 2022). Two patient cohorts were defined: an ALIS and non-ALIS cohort. Index date was date of first prescription with ALIS or non-ALIS antibiotic for refractory MACLD. Hospitalizations (all-cause, respiratory-related, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)-related) and emergency room (ER) visits at 0-6-month and 7-12-month post-index periods were compared with baseline (6-month pre-index period) per cohort. Multivariate logistic regression models compared the odds of hospitalizations or ER visits between cohorts.

Results: The ALIS and non-ALIS cohorts comprised 116 and 63 patients, respectively. The most common add-on treatments for refractory MACLD in the non-ALIS cohort were parenteral amikacin (41.3%) and moxifloxacin (27.0%). In the ALIS cohort, significant reductions from baseline, as compared with the 7-12-month post-index period, were observed in all-cause (12.1% vs 22.4%), respiratory-related (8.6% vs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 116 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free