Evidence Hub

Five-year analysis of Haemophilus influenzae isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones: prevalence results from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program

Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2003

Abstract

The appearance of resistance or reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones among Hemophilus influenzae has been documented for nearly a decade. Over this time, the use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of respiratory infections including commonly isolated bacterial causes of community-acquired infections has markedly increased. The documentation of resistance to fluoroquinolones among Streptococcus pneumoniae and H. influenzae has also become more prevalent as measured by peer-reviewed publications. During 1997-2001, a total of 11,355 H. influenzae isolates were tested by reference broth microdilution methods from strains collected by the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (American and European medical centers). Strains with reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones (RSF) were detected during all five study years at an overall rate of 0.15%. Among the tested compounds, sitafloxacin (MIC(50,) 0.03 microg/ml) was the most potent agent against the RSF strains, followed by gemifloxacin (0.12 microg/ml) > garenoxacin = grepafloxacin = levofloxacin = moxifloxacin = trovafloxacin (0.5 microg/ml) > ciprofloxacin = sparfloxacin (1 microg/ml). Gene sequencing of the quinolone resistance determining region and epidemiologic typing of 30 RSF isolates showed diverse mutational events in gyr A and par C and multiple pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns among strains that was not consistent with clonal dissemination. Continued surveillance by global or national…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free