Evidence Hub

Hospital acquired drug resistant pathogens infections in patients with viral respiratory tract infections: a retrospective study

Fan Z, Xu X, Li Q, Zhou T, Wang A, Ma C, Chen Z, Lu L et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

1,051 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory infections (VRTIs) caused by influenza (Flu) and COVID-19 pose significant global health challenges. Clinical outcomes are further exacerbated by infections with hospital acquired drug resistant pathogens (DRPs).

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 1,051 hospitalized patients with VRTIs from 2018 to 2024 at Beijing Ditan Hospital. Firstly, 280 drug-resistant strains were isolated from 185 patients with hospital-acquired DRPs infections for extended antibiogram analysis. Secondly, Interpretable machine learning (ML) was employed to predict the risk factors for hospital acquired DRPs infections in patients with VRTIs. Using the optimal feature subset, seven ML prediction models were developed. Parameter tuning was performed via 10-fold cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) was used to interpret the optimal model.

RESULTS: Pathogen distribution in 280 clinical samples revealed sputum (65.36%) as themainsource, followed byblood (15.36%), urine (11.43%), and lavage fluid (5.00%). In all clinical specimens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus hominis, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter baumannii predominated in sputum, blood, urine, and lavage fluid, respectively. In terms of overall detection counts, the most frequently isolated strains were P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,051 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free