Evidence Hub

Differences in clinical characteristics of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae

You T, Zhang H, Guo L, Ling KR, Hu XY, Li LQ

International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology, 2020

Abstract

To identify differences in the clinical characteristics of early- and late-onset sepsis (EOS and LOS) caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) and to describe the risk factors for multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae (MDR-KP) infection. Infants with K. pneumoniae-induced sepsis who were admitted to a children's Hospital between Jan 2000 and Dec 2019 were included. All infants were divided into EOS and LOS groups, as well as MDR-KP and non-MDR-KP groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and risk factors were compared between the two groups. One hundred eighty infants (66 with EOS and 114 with LOS) were further analyzed, accounting for 36.8% of sepsis cases caused by MDR-KP. The frequency of respiratory failure, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and intraventricular hemorrhage were more common in the LOS group and a higher rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome was more common in infants in the EOS group (P < 0.05). K. pneumoniae showed a low sensitivity to penicillin, beta-lactams and cephalosporins, and it showed a high sensitivity to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. Prematurity, low birth weight, longer antibiotic exposure time, long duration of peripheral catheter insertion, long mechanical ventilation time, and long parenteral nutrition time were associated with an increased rate of MDR-KP infection by univariate analysis (P < 0.05). The regression analysis identified a long antibiotic exposure time (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.01-1.89) and long parenteral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free