Evidence Hub

Etiological analysis of infectious keratitis in children from 2007 to 2016

Wang ZQ, Zhang Y, Sun XG

[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology, 2022

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the etiological changes of children with infectious keratitis. Methods: Retrospective study. Data of patients diagnosed as bacterial, fungal, and amoebic keratitis from 2007 to 2016, aged no more than 14 years old, were collected in the Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital. A total of 649 samples were obtained for routine laboratory culture identification and drug sensitivity tests. There were 361 males and 278 females, aged (5.6±4.4) years. The data were analyzed according to age ≤3 years, 4 to 7 years and>7 years. The qualitative data were analyzed by the Chi-square test. Results: Among 649 samples, 140 were culture positive, and the positive rate was 21.6%. Bacteria were the main pathogens, accounting for 81.4%. The positive rate was 31.0% among bacterial samples (114/368), and the bacterial flora was mainly Gram-positive cocci, followed by Gram-negative bacilli. Streptococcus (34.2%) ranked first, followed by Staphylococcus (27.2%) and Pseudomonas (7.9%). For children no more than 7 years old, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common bacterial species, while Staphylococcus epidermidis was most common in those aged 8-14 years. Gram-positive cocci were sensitive to vancomycin. Most bacteria were more sensitive to fluoroquinolones and less sensitive to cephalosporins and aminoguanidine. The detection rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus was 68% (17/25). Gatifloxacin had the highest sensitivity, while the difference between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free