Evidence Hub

Emergence of Hypervirulent ST11-K64 Klebsiella pneumoniae Poses a Serious Clinical Threat in Older Patients

Wei T, Zou C, Qin J, Tao J, Yan L, Wang J, Du H, Shen F et al.

Frontiers in public health, 2022

Abstract

The carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-hvKP) poses a severe therapeutic challenge to global public health, and research on CR-hvKP in older patients remain limited. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical and molecular characteristics and risk factors of CR-hvKP infections in older patients. We retrospectively investigated older patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2020 and December 2020. The clinical data, and microbiological data including antimicrobial susceptibility testing, phenotype experiment and detection of carbapenemases, string test, virulence genes, capsular serotype-specific (cps) genes, and multilocus sequence typing, of the CR-hvKP group defined by the presence of any one of the virulence genes, including rmpA, rmpA2, iucA, iroN, and peg-344 were compared with those of CR-non-hvKP strains. Of the 80 CRKP strains, 51 (63.8%) met the definition of CR-hvKP. The main mechanism of resistance to carbapenems was the presence of the blaKPC-2 gene. Sequence type (ST)11 (81.3%, 65/80) and ST15 (16.3%, 13/80) were the most common STs in CRKP strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)50 values of the CR-hvKP group against the six tested antibiotics (ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-avibactam, tigecycline, levofloxacin, and Cefoperazone-Sulbactam) exhibited elevated levels than the CR-non-hvKP group. Ceftazidime and imipenem by…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free