Evidence Hub

Age-Related Trends in Adults with Community-Onset Bacteremia

Lee CC, Wang JL, Lee CH, Hung YP, Hong MY, Chang CM, Ko WC

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017

2,349 participants

Abstract

To understand the epidemiological variation in bacteremia characteristics among differently aged populations, adults with community-onset bacteremia during a 6-year period were studied in a retrospective cohort. A total of 2,349 bacteremic patients were stratified into four age categories: young adults (18 to 44 years old; 196 patients; 8.3%), adults (45 to 64 years old; 707 patients; 30.1%), the elderly (65 to 84 years old; 1,098 patients; 46.7%), and the oldest old (≥85 years old; 348 patients; 14.8%). Age-related trends in critical illness (a Pitt bacteremia score of ≥4) at bacteremia onset, antibiotic-resistant pathogens (extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, and Proteus mirabilis [EKP]; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA]; and levofloxacin nonsusceptible EKP), inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT), and 4-week mortality rate were observed. Using a multivariate regression model, critical illness at bacteremia onset (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 9.03; P < 0.001) and inappropriate EAT (AOR, 2.67; P < 0.001) were the two leading predictors of 4-week mortality. Moreover, ESBL-producing EKP (AOR, 12.94; P < 0.001), MRSA (AOR, 8.66; P < 0.001), and levofloxacin-nonsusceptible EKP (AOR, 4.27; P < 0.001) were linked to inappropriate EAT. In conclusion, among adults with community onset bacteremia, significant positive age-related trends were noted in antibiotic-resistant pathogens and bacteremia severity,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,349 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free