Evidence Hub

The association between time-weighted remnant cholesterol and cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality: A population-based cohort study

L. Li, V. Chou, O. Chou, S. Roy, J. Chan, W. Wong, T. Liu, G. Lip et al.

medRxiv, 2024

75,342 participants

Abstract

Background: Remnant cholesterol (RC) have been suggested as a significant mediator of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. However, the relationship between RC with cause-specific mortality in long-term remained uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the association between time-weighted RC and cause-specific mortality outcomes. Methods: This retrospective population-based study enrolled patients attending family medicine clinics in Hong Kong between 1st January 2000, to 31st December 2003 with at least three RC testing results during follow-up. The time-weighted RC was calculated by the products of the sums of two consecutive measurements and the time interval divided by the total time. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality outcomes. Cox regression and marginal effective plots were applied to identify associations between time-weighted RC and mortality. Results: A cohort of 75,342 patients (39.69% males, mean age: 61.3 years old) with at least three valid RC test were included. During up to 19 years of follow-up, in the multivariate model adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, medications, and time-weighted laboratory results, time-weighted RC was associated with all-cause mortality (Hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.35-1.48) but not RC (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89-1.10). Time-weighted RC was also associated with increased risks of cardiovascular-related mortality (HR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.27-1.54), cancer-related…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 75,342 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free