Evidence Hub

627: epidemiology of severe pediatric pneumonia in asia: a prospective multinational observational study

J. J. Wong, Qalab Abbas, H. Dang, P. Phan, Liang Guo, Chunfeng Liu, J. Wang, P. Lee et al.

Critical Care Medicine, 2022

786 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Severe pneumonia is a common indication for admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. The lack of epidemiology and outcome data from Asia is a barrier to improving outcomes of severe pneumonia in the region. METHOD(S): This is a prospective multicenter cohort study carried out from April 2019 to April 2022. Fifteen PICUs participated in this study under the Pediatric Acute & Critical Care Medicine Asian Network. Epidemiological, microbiological and outcome data were collected up to hospital discharge. Univariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to explore the association between potential risk factors and severe outcomes [acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and PICU mortality]. Multivariable analysis was performed withforward stepwise logistic regression adjusted for sites and COVID-19 pandemic including variables with p< 0.05 in univariate model. RESULT(S): There were 786 children with severe pneumonia in PICU with mean (standard deviation) age 2.8 (3.9) years. 384/786 (48.9%) had comorbidities;126/786 (16.0%) had a history of prematurity (gestational age < 37 weeks). Admission Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM3) and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD2) score were 16.2 (22.9) and 4.1(4.6). A sole viral or bacterial pathogen was identified in 179/786 (22.4%) and 165/786 (21.0%). Co-infections occurred in 114/786 (14.5%) patients. ARDS and mortality occurred in 156/786…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 786 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free