Evidence Hub

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of ventilator-associated pneumonia in an intensive care unit in Vietnam

K. Hayakawa, B. Nguyen, Xuan C. Dao, T. T. Pham, Thuy Thi Phuong Pham, C. Ngo, M. Huong, Do Van Thanh et al.

Infection Prevention in Practice, 2023

125 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Summary Background The increasing incidence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a global concern. A better understanding of the epidemiology of VAP in Southeast Asia is essential to optimise treatments and patient outcomes. Methods VAP epidemiology in an intensive care unit in Vietnam was investigated. A prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients who were ventilated for >48 hours, diagnosed with VAP, and had a positive respiratory culture between October 2015 and March 2017 were included. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Results We identified 125 patients (137 episodes) with VAP from 1,699 admissions. Twelve patients had 2 VAP episodes. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range: 48–70), and 68.8% of patients were male. Diabetes mellitus was the most frequent comorbidity (N=35, 28%). Acinetobacter baumannii was most frequently isolated in the first VAP episode (N=84, 67.2%) and was multiply resistant to meropenem, levofloxacin, and amikacin. The 30-day mortality rate was 55.2% (N=69) and higher in patients infected with A. baumannii (N=52, 65%). WGS results suggested a complex spread of multiple clones. Conclusions In an intensive care unit in Vietnam, VAP due to A. baumannii had a high mortality rate, and A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae were multidrug resistant, with carbapenem resistance of 97% and 70%, respectively.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 125 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free