Evidence Hub

212. Effectiveness of Empirical Piperacillin/tazobactam Compared to Cefepime for Bloodstream Infection Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli

Young Ho Lee, Jinyoung Yang, Jae-Hoon Ko, Young-Cho Sun, Heejae Huh, Nam Yong Lee, C. Kang, Doo Ryeon Chung et al.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2023

Abstract

Abstract Background Piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) and cefepime (CFP) are commonly used antibiotics for healthcare-associated infections and immunocompromised patients. However, few studies have compared the clinical effectiveness of these two antibiotics. Thus, we compared the effectiveness of empirical PTZ and CFP in patients with monomicrobial blood-stream infection (BSI) caused by gram-negative bacilli. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive, non-duplicate monomicrobial BSIs caused by 1 of 4 taxa (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species) identified from a nationwide, prospective surveillance (Korean Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network [KARS-Net]). Patients who were treated with PTZ or CFP as the only active empirical antibiotic were included. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital 30-day mortality. Logistic regression with backward selection was used to adjust for imbalance in baseline characteristics. Results A total of 120 cases were included, among which 87 (72.5%) were treated with PTZ and 33 (27.5%) with CFP. Underlying renal disease was more common in the PTZ group whereas malignancy, septic shock, and neutropenia were more common in the CFP group. (Table 1). All-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups (16.1% vs 12.1%, p=0.777; table 2), as well as attributable mortality. However, the early clinical response at 72 hr was significantly more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free