Evidence Hub

Low GAS carriage in school-aged children in western China during the national atypical scarlet fever resurgence: Insights from two cross-sectional studies

Guo M, Hou X, Shi W, Huang Q, Gao W, Dong L, Lai Y, Chen S et al.

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2025

1,835 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study examined group A streptococcus(GAS) carriage, emm types, and antibiotic susceptibility in children (6-13 years) in Aral, China, during the post-COVID-19 scarlet fever resurgence, providing regional insights.

METHODS: The prevalence of GAS carriage was assessed in 1,835 children aged 6-13 years across two surveys at an Aral school in China during the post-COVID-19 resurgence of scarlet fever. GAS isolates were analyzed for emm types, M1UK lineage, and antimicrobial susceptibility using culture, PCR, sequencing, and automated methods.

RESULTS: The first survey (885 children) showed a 1.9% isolation rate, highest in 9-year-olds (4.8%) and slightly higher in boys (2.3% vs. 1.5%, P > 0.05). The second survey (950 children) reported a 3.1% rate, peaking at 10 years (6.7%) and also higher in boys (3.5% vs. 2.6%, P > 0.05). Colonization rates were similar overall (P > 0.05), but increased significantly in children aged ≥10 years (1.1% to 3.3%, P = 0.038). No children tested positive for GAS in both sampling rounds, which meant that the two surveys identified distinct host populations colonized by the bacteria. Emm12 prevalence decreased from 76.5% to 55.2% (P > 0.05), while emm1 increased from 11.8% to 31.0% (P > 0.05), with no M1UK lineage detected. All isolates were sensitive to penicillin, linezolid, vancomycin, and levofloxacin. Among 33 co-resistant isolates, emm12 accounted for 84.8% and emm1 for 15.2%.

CONCLUSION: Despite low GAS carriage rates,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,835 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free