Evidence Hub

Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia with pleural effusion using multiplex PCR-based targeted next-generation sequencing: A case report

Jin Y, He L, Wang J, Ren T, Wang H, Wang Y

Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2026

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia (CPP) is a zoonotic disease with non-specific clinical and radiographic features, complicating timely diagnosis. Although not common, pleural effusion may indicate more severe disease. Conventional diagnostic methods lack the sensitivity and speed. The present report highlights the utility of multiplex PCR-based targeted next-generation sequencing (mp-tNGS) for rapid etiological diagnosis of CPP, particularly in patients with pleural effusion. A 52-year-old woman and a 64-year-old woman both presented with high fever, cough and systemic symptoms. Inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6 and ESR) were found to be markedly elevated with normal or mildly elevated white blood cell counts. A chest CT exhibited unilateral consolidations with small ipsilateral pleural effusions. Conventional microbiological tests (stains, cultures and serology) were negative. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid mp-tNGS rapidly identified Chlamydia psittaci (142 and 251 reads per 100,000 sequencing reads, respectively), with a mean turnaround time of 11.35 h (from laboratory receipt to result). Epidemiological history revealed exposure to pigeons and a bird market. Doxycycline therapy led to rapid clinical improvement, fever resolution and notable radiographic clearance. Therefore, pleural effusion can be a feature of CPP and may indicate more severe disease. mp-tNGS proved rapid and decisive when conventional methods failed, enabling timely targeted therapy. A high index of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free