Evidence Hub

Severe pneumonia and bloodstream dissemination caused by Mycobacterium houstonense in a patient with achalasia: clinical importance of genospecies typing

Bindraban S, Hughes L, Fliss M, Gard L, Akkerman O, Sinha B, Raangs E, de Vries Y et al.

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by members of the Mycobacterium fortuitum complex are generally mild and confined to skin and soft tissues, while severe disease in immunocompetent individuals is uncommon. Within the Mycobacterium fortuitum complex, the unnamed third biovariant complex comprises several closely related species that cannot be reliably distinguished using routine molecular diagnostic methods. Importantly, species within this complex show marked interspecies variability in antimicrobial susceptibility, including predictable intrinsic resistance patterns, with direct consequences for empiric treatment selection in severe infections. Because antimicrobial susceptibility testing for rapidly growing mycobacteria typically requires at least one week, rapid and accurate species-level identification is essential to guide effective early therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of life-threatening pneumonia with bloodstream dissemination caused by a third-biovariant M. fortuitum complex species in an otherwise immunocompetent 44-year-old woman with previously undiagnosed achalasia. Routine diagnostics identified the isolate as belonging to the M. fortuitum complex but were insufficient for species-level identification. Whole-genome sequencing was performed and identified the pathogen as Mycobacterium houstonense, a species historically considered rare in human disease. The patient developed severe respiratory failure and sepsis, requiring prolonged intensive care…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free