Evidence Hub

Reactive Infectious Mucocutaneous Eruption (RIME) Associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Clinical and Immunological Insights from Pediatric Cases

Matea DM, Isac R, Boeriu E, Urtila P, Doros G, Bataneant M, Oprisoni AL, Arghirescu ST

Microorganisms, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Reactive infectious mucocutaneous eruption (RIME) is a rare pediatric condition characterized by severe mucositis, minimal cutaneous involvement, and an infectious rather than drug-induced etiology. Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. Pneumoniae) represents the most frequently identified trigger, although an increasing number of alternative pathogens have been reported. Its clinical overlap with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) makes early recognition difficult. We reviewed literature data on the topic and described our center's experience with three pediatric cases of M. pneumoniae-associated RIME. Medical records, laboratory results, and imaging were systematically analyzed. All patients were male, aged 2 to 12 years and originated from rural communities. Etiologic confirmation was achieved via M. pneumoniae IgM serology and/or polymerase chain reaction. Clinical exam modifications included multi-site mucositis (oral, ocular, genital) with variable skin involvement: absent in one case, a solitary palm ulcer in another, and widespread rash in the third. One patient required two hospitalizations within a six-month interval, confirming the possible relapsing phenotype of RIME. Another patient developed pneumonia, sepsis, and systemic inflammation. All received macrolide therapy, antifungals, mucosal supportive care, and systemic management as indicated. Recovery occurred within 10-21 days, with one patient exhibiting skin hyperpigmentation. These cases illustrate the heterogeneity of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free