Evidence Hub

Unsuspected tuberculosis in COPD and use of levofloxacin: diagnostic challenges

Modesto dos Santos V, Martins RR, Fachinelli LR, Araujo MC, dos Santos UM, Ribeiro KD

Le infezioni in medicina, 2014

Abstract

A 92-year-old female ex-smoker with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) GOLD III, was admitted because of communitarian pneumonia in November 2013. She had been using inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators and presented five exacerbations of COPD due to pneumonia in the same year, with hospitalizations in March and September. The patient underwent the routine protocol for exacerbated COPD, and bacilloscopy for tuberculosis (TB) was negative. On admission, she had intense dyspnea and a productive cough that improved by administration of levofloxacin. Tests with Ziehll-Neelsen staining in bronchopulmonary secretions resulted negative. Notwithstanding, during actual admission, the culture in Lowenstein-Jensen medium seeded in September was found positive for M. tuberculosis susceptible to isoniazid, rifampin, streptomycin, and ethambutol. Therefore, the patient underwent the standard regimen for tuberculosis. Except in September, when she used piperacillin-tazobactam, all previous exacerbations of COPD were treated with levofloxacin. This effective drug against M. tuberculosis can hinder its growth in culture. The use of levofloxacin in unsuspected TB may constitute an additional diagnostic challenge, and risk of late diagnosis is increased in patients with COPD in use of inhaled corticosteroids. Case studies may contribute to increase the suspicion index about TB associated with COPD.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free