Evidence Hub

When "Pneumonia" Does Not Resolve: A Case of Pulmonary Embolism Leading to Cavitary Pulmonary Infarction

Neupane A, Diamante A, Chhetri A, Kyei-Nimako E, Abdalla A

Cureus, 2026

Abstract

Pulmonary infarction (PI) is a recognized but relatively uncommon complication of pulmonary embolism (PE). Because its clinical presentation and imaging findings often overlap with those of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), PI is frequently misdiagnosed. Progression to cavitation is exceedingly rare and typically reflects extensive, irreversible parenchymal necrosis. We describe a 66-year-old woman with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) who initially presented with symptoms consistent with CAP. Although she initially improved, she re-presented ten days later with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and a newly developed smooth-walled cavitary lung lesion. Chest computed tomography confirmed a submassive PE complicated by necrotizing PI and secondary abscess formation. Given the failure of conservative management and evidence of parenchymal gangrene with the need for source control, she underwent urgent right lateral thoracotomy with bilobectomy for source control. The post-operative course was complicated by refractory shock and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest. Following goals-of-care discussions, the family elected to pursue comfort-focused care. This case shows the importance of systemic-to-pulmonary collateral circulation in preserving lung parenchymal viability. In patients with limited cardiovascular reserve, failure of bronchial arterial compensation can precipitate catastrophic necrotizing infarction.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free