Evidence Hub

Humidifier lung diagnosed by integrating environmental assessment and inhalation provocation testing: a case with Purpureocillium lilacinum as the most likely causative antigen

Noguchi S, Mizuno W, Watanabe K, Ohara S, Sakatani T, Usui K

Respiratory medicine case reports, 2026

Abstract

Humidifier lung is a rare phenotype of hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by inhalation of aerosolized antigens from contaminated humidifiers, and identification of the causative antigen is often challenging. We report a case of humidifier lung in a 63-year-old woman who presented with recurrent episodes of fever, cough, and dyspnea. Chest computed tomography showed diffuse ground-glass opacities with mosaic attenuation, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid revealed lymphocytosis. Her symptoms improved without treatment during hospitalization but recurred 5 hours after returning home, suggesting re-exposure to an environmental antigen. A humidifier challenge test reproduced symptoms, including fever, cough, and hypoxemia, necessitating systemic corticosteroid therapy. Fungal contamination was identified within the internal components of the humidifier, from which Purpureocillium lilacinum was isolated. A serum precipitin test using an antigen prepared from the isolate showed a positive reaction. Although precipitin testing with a routine antigen panel showed positivity for multiple antigens, possible cross-reactivity was considered. Taken together, these findings led to the diagnosis of humidifier lung, with Purpureocillium lilacinum considered the most likely causative antigen. This case highlights the importance of integrating the clinical course, environmental assessment, and provocation testing in identifying causative antigens in humidifier lung.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free