Evidence Hub

Case Report: A diagnostic pitfall of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and atypical tongue pain: the critical role of PET/CT-guided repeat bone marrow biopsy

Meng L, Li J, Chen R, Wang X, Zhuge Y, Kong Q, Jin Q, Zhang Y

Frontiers in oncology, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) represents a rare but life-threatening clinical entity characterized by diagnostic complexity and high mortality. Early manifestations are often nonspecific, and initial bone marrow examination may be falsely negative due to patchy infiltration, leading to delayed recognition of the underlying malignancy.

Case presentation: We report a 68-year-old woman who presented with prolonged fever and atypical tongue pain, initially suspected to be caused by pulmonary infection. Despite broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, fever persisted and progressive cytopenias, hyperferritinemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and elevated soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels fulfilled the HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria. Although corticosteroid therapy achieved transient clinical improvement, the initial bone marrow biopsy revealed no malignancy. Following relapse of fever after steroid withdrawal, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) demonstrated diffuse hypermetabolic activity in the spleen and bone marrow. PET/CT-guided repeat bone marrow biopsy subsequently confirmed non-germinal center B-cell-type DLBCL with marrow involvement. The patient achieved clinical remission after initiation of immunochemotherapy.

Conclusion: This case highlights HLH as a major diagnostic blind spot in occult B-cell lymphoma and underscores the limitations of single-site bone marrow biopsy. Persistent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free