Evidence Hub

β-lactam antibiotics to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in coma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

E. Meregildo-Rodríguez, Mariano Ortiz-Pizarro, Martha Genara Asmat-Rubio, Carlos Geraldo Fernandez-Narváez, G. Vásquez-Tirado

Medicina Intensiva, 2025

483 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of parenteral β-lactam antibiotics on outcomes related to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in adult patients in coma due to acute brain injury (ABI).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up toSeptember 30, 2024.

PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients in coma due to ABI.

INTERVENTIONS

Parenteral β-lactam antibiotics.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Incidence and outcomes related to VAP.

RESULTS

Three RCTs involving 483 patients met inclusion criteria; 231 patients received β-lactam prophylaxis. Among these, there were 115 cases of early-onset VAP (EO-VAP), 49 of late-onset VAP (LO-VAP), and 102 deaths. All studies were conducted in Europe. Causes of coma included trauma, stroke, and CO poisoning. Intravenous β-lactams (ampicillin/sulbactam, cefuroxime, and ceftriaxone) reduced EO-VAP risk by 57% (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.30-0.61), and all-VAP by 35% (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53-0.80). No impact was observed on LO-VAP (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.54-1.67), 28-day mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.53-1.09), intubation duration (SMD -0.13; 95% CI -0.46-0.21), or ICU length of stay (SMD -0.22; 95% CI -0.55-0.12). Heterogeneity and the risk of bias were low, with high overall evidence certainty.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients in coma due to ABI, intravenous β-lactam antibiotics reduce EO-VAP and all-VAP risk.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 483 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free