Evidence Hub

Risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Hongwei Yang, Juan Wang, J. Hui, Zhong-Jian Li, Xueying Li, Rui Liu, Min Li, Xiu Wang

BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 2025

3,664 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with Acute exacerbations of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and other databases for studies investigating risk factors for VAP in patients experiencing AECOPD. The search encompassed records from database inception up to July 2, 2025. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 18.0. A total of 16 articles were included, encompassing 3,664 subjects and 16 risk factors. Meta-analysis results showed that, Age (OR: 2.49, 95%CI : 1.49, 4.17; P < 0.001), Smoking history (OR: 2.70, 95%CI : 1.65, 4.44; P < 0.001), Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation composite score (APACHE Ⅱ) score (OR: 3.03, 95%CI : 1.98, 4.65; P < 0.001), Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (OR: 2.75, 95%CI : 1.90, 3.99; P < 0.001), Diabetes (OR: 2.11, 95%CI : 1.38, 3.24; P = 0.001), Underlying Diseases (OR: 3.42, 95%CI : 1.85, 6.32; P < 0.001), Duration of mechanical ventilation (OR: 4.53, 95%CI : 2.68, 7.65; P < 0.001), Tracheal intubation (OR: 4.21, 95%CI : 1.85, 9.57; P = 0.001), Indwelling gastric tube (OR: 3.31, 95%CI : 1.38, 7.95; P = 0.008), Total parenteral nutrition (OR: 1.86, 95%CI : 1.29, 2.70; P = 0.001), Combined antibiotics (OR: 2.79, 95%CI : 1.32, 5.93; P = 0.007), Tracheotomy (OR: 2.92, 95%CI :…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,664 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free