Evidence Hub

Association of SGLT2I vs. DPP4I with Pneumonia, COVID-19, and Adverse Respiratory Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meng-Na Wang, Ming Li, Libin Wang, Fang Wang, Xu Cao, Shengyou Li, Zhi-Chang Zheng

Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 2024

19 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the association of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2I) vs. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP4I) with pneumonia, COVID-19, and adverse respiratory events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were retrieved to include studies on DM patients receiving SGLT2I (exposure group) or DPP4I (control group). Stata.15.0 statistical software was employed for meta-analysis.

RESULT

Ten studies were included, 10 of which were used for the qualitative review and 7 for the meta-analysis. According to the meta-analysis, patients receiving SGLT2I had lower pneumonia incidence (OR=0.62, 95% Cl, 0.51-0.74) and pneumonia risk (OR=0.63, 95% Cl, 0.60-0.68, P=0.000) compared to those receiving DPP4I. The same situation occurs in mortality rate of pneumonia (OR=0.49, 95% Cl, 0.39-0.60) and pneumonia mortality risk (OR=0.47, 95% Cl, 0.42-0.51) . Lower mortality of COVID-19 (OR=0.31, 95% Cl, 0.28 -0.34), and a lower hospitalization rate and incidence of mechanical ventilation (OR=0.61, 95% Cl, 0.56-0.68, P=0.000, OR=0.69, 95% Cl, 0.58-0.83, P=0.000) due to COVID-19 in patients with type 2 DM receiving SGLT2I. The qualitative analysis results showed that SGLT2I was associated with a lower incidence of COVID-19, lower risk of obstructive Airway disease (OAD) events, and lower hospitalization rate of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) than DPP4I.

CONCLUSION

In patients with type 2…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free