Evidence Hub

Risk factors for hospital-acquired pneumonia in hip fracture patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

W. Yao, Xiao-jie Sun, Wanyun Tang, Wei Wang, Qiaomei Lv, Wenbo Ding

Medicine, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to comprehensively assess the prevalence and risk factors for Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in hip fracture patients by meta-analysis. Methods: Systematically searched 4 English databases and 4 Chinese databases from inception until October 20, 2022. All studies involving risk factors of HAP in patients with hip fractures will be considered. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The results were presented through Review Manager 5.4 with the pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval. Results: Of 35 articles included in this study, the incidence of HAP was 8.9%. 43 risk factors for HAP were initially included, 23 were eventually involved in the meta-analysis, and 21 risk factors were significant. Among them, the 4 most frequently mentioned risk factors were as follows: Advanced age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05–1.10), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.83–4.19), time from injury to operation (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.07–1.12), time from injury to operation ≥ 48 hours (OR 3.59, 95% CI 2.88–4.48), and hypoalbuminemia < 3.5g/dL (OR 2.68, 95% CI 2.15–3.36). Discussion: Hip fracture patients diagnosed with COPD have a 3.44 times higher risk of HAP compared to the general hip fracture patients. The risk of HAP also increases with age, with patients over 70 having a 2.34-fold higher risk and those over 80 having a 2.98-fold higher risk. These findings highlight the need for tailored…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free