Evidence Hub

Effects of Candida colonization on patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and pathogenic microorganisms: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Yushan Liu, Ting-Ting Xu, Qiwen Tan, Lijuan Xiong

Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2024

3,802 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the intensive care unit (ICU), patients undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) often exhibit Candida colonization. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the effects of Candida colonization on the outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients and its relationship with bacterial pathogens associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) without language restrictions to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria involved patients undergoing MV for >2 days, encompassing those with clinically suspected VAP (csVAP), and confirmed VAP patients. We assessed the impact of Candida colonization on patient prognosis, length of ICU stay, bacterial pathogens responsible for VAP, and inflammatory markers. The study protocol was registered with PROSPER (CRD42024580547).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 3,802 patients were included in our analysis. The prevalence of Candida colonization among MV patients ranged from 10 % to 56 %. Our findings indicated that Candida airway colonization was associated with poorer patient prognosis (95 % CI 1.13-1.52, p < 0.05, I² = 39 %). Among patients who developed VAP, Candida colonization correlated with increased detection rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (RR = 1.37, 95 % CI 1.07-1.75, p = 0.01, I² = 3 %) and Acinetobacter baumannii (RR= 1.48, 95 % CI 1.17-1.86, p <…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,802 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free