Evidence Hub

The impact of tracheostomy timing on the outcomes of patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Negin Zameni, Masoud Khoshnoodi, Brandon Lucke-Wold, J. Harrop, Armin Karamian

Clinical neurology and neurosurgery (Dutch-Flemish ed. Print), 2025

3,853 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury (SCI) can cause serious respiratory problems. Cervical high-level injuries may result in diaphragm paralysis, necessitating tracheostomy to assist airway protection and facilitate breathing.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed for published studies comparing outcomes between early versus late tracheostomy in acute traumatic SCI patients.

RESULTS

The initial search returned 1837 articles, after the final review, 17 studies with a total of 3853 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mortality rate between early and late tracheostomy was not statistically significant (OR = 0.81, 95 % CI = [0.37, 1.78], P = 0.61). However, early tracheostomy was associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = - 10.58, 95 % CI = [-15.22, -5.95], P < 0.01), hospital length of stay (MD = - 8.50, 95 % CI = [-10.95, -6.05], P < 0.01), and ICU length of stay (MD = - 9.12, 95 % CI = [-12.20, -6.05], P < 0.01). Early tracheostomy was also associated with a lower incidence of pneumonia (OR = 0.68, 95 % CI = [0.51, 0.91], P < 0.01). Patients in the early tracheostomy group also experienced fewer tracheostomy-related complications (OR = 0.50, 95 % CI = [0.33, 0.75], P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute traumatic SCI, early tracheostomy within seven days of injury, surgery, or intubation is associated with reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,853 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free