Evidence Hub

Association Between Elevated Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Mortality Risk in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zubair Ahmad Ganaie, Yousef Aqel, Bsher Almaalouli, Loiy Naser Alsarkhi, Albeena Kabir Dar, Abdelaziz Maali Abusal, Calvin R. Wei, Adil Amin

Cureus, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived from routine complete blood count parameters, has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker reflecting systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between elevated NLR and mortality risk in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases from January 2011 to August 2025, identifying studies that measured NLR in adult CAP patients with mortality as an endpoint. Twelve observational studies were included, comprising diverse patient populations across different healthcare settings. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with relative risk as the primary effect measure. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled analysis demonstrated that elevated NLR was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality risk in CAP patients (RR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.18-3.47, p<0.05). Patients with high NLR values had approximately twice the risk of death compared to those with lower ratios. Pooled analysis showed that high NLR was associated with increased risk of ICU admission (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.53). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I² = 99% for mortality, 85% for ICU admission), likely reflecting variations in patient populations, NLR cutoff values, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free