Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Physical and Therapy Interventions for Non-ICU Hospitalized Pneumonia Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Takako Tanaka, Yorihide Yanagita, Tatsuya Morishita, Fumiya Nagata, María Granados Santiago, L. López-López, M. Valenza

Healthcare, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia is a leading cause of hospitalization worldwide, particularly among older adults and individuals with comorbidities. Physical therapy is increasingly recognized as a key component in improving health-related outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with non-complicated hospital pneumonia. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the impact of physical therapy on clinical outcomes in non-ICU (Intensive Care Unit) pneumonia patients compared with usual care. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024565419). PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials from their inception to July 2024. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2.0 (RoB 2) and the Downs and Black checklist were used for quality assessment. A quantitative synthesis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) version 5 software program. Results: We selected nine studies, which included 1349 hospitalized non-ICU pneumonia patients. The results showed significant differences in favor of physical therapy interventions compared to usual care, with a reduction in length of hospital stay (p = 0.009). Also, there were significant differences in dyspnea levels (p < 0.00001). Conclusions: Physical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free