Evidence Hub

Risk prediction models for pneumonia in hospitalized stroke patients: A systematic review

Man-Lin Yan, Weirong Huang, Zhi-Hui Zhang, Meixuan Song, Xian-Rong Li

medRxiv, 2024

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate risk prediction models for pneumonia occurrence during hospitalization in stroke patients. Methods: Computer searches were conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO databases for literature related to risk prediction models for pneumonia in hospitalized stroke patients, with search dates ranging from database inception to June 13, 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias and applicability of the included studies via the Prediction Model Risk of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). Results: A total of 43 studies were included, among which 33 studies developed a total of 56 new models, and 25 studies externally validated 19 models. Among the 56 new models, 29 used a logistic regression model (LR), 25 used a machine learning model (ML), 1 used a classification and regression tree model (CART), and 1 used a linear regression model. The reported area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.565 to 0.960. The number of predictors explicitly reported for one model was 1,046, with the top three predictors most commonly used being age, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and dysphagia. The PROBAST results revealed that all 43 studies had a high risk of bias, and 27 studies had poor applicability. Conclusion: Although the pneumonia risk prediction models for hospitalized stroke patients in the included studies achieved good…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free