Evidence Hub

Bacterial Etiology of Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Pakistan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Khowaja Rahil, K. Fazila

Archives of Community Medicine and Public Health, 2025

1,793 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Accurate knowledge of the epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is essential for guiding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify and quantify the prevalence of common bacterial pathogens responsible for CAP in adult patients in Pakistan to improve empirical treatment strategies.

Methods: We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published in English between January 1, 2000, and December 1, 2024. Studies were included if they reported bacterial etiology of radiologically confirmed CAP in adult patients in Pakistan. Quality assessment was performed using standardized criteria, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 1,793 CAP patients from three major cities: Karachi (n=4 studies), Lahore (n=1), and Rawalpindi (n=1).

Results: Meta-analysis revealed Streptococcus pneumoniae as the predominant pathogen (14%, 95% CI: 8-20%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12%, 95% CI: 3-21%), Haemophilus influenzae (9%, 95% CI: 2-16%), and Staphylococcus aureus (8%, 95% CI: 2-13%). Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies (I² > 94% for all pathogens), attributable to variations in patient demographics (mean age range: 44.8-63.6 years), diagnostic methods (primarily sputum and blood cultures), and clinical settings (5 inpatient and 2 outpatient studies).

Conclusion: While S. pneumoniae…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,793 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free