Evidence Hub

Global prevalence of stroke-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Sogand Sarmadi, Neda Sanaie, Akbar Zare-Kaseb

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2025

4,272,805 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Neurological damage resulting from stroke can impair the respiratory system, leaving stroke patients susceptible to pulmonary complications, such as stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). Due to the substantial mortality risk associated with SAP and its complications, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the global prevalence of SAP. Method A comprehensive search of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 7 August 2024. The cross-sectional studies were selected. The primary study outcome was the prevalence of SAP. Subgroup analysis was implemented. The random-effects method was used to implement meta-analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool for prevalence was used to assess risk of bias in the included studies. Result A comprehensive search of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from 1 January 2014 to 7 August 2024. The cross-sectional studies were selected. The primary study outcome was the prevalence of SAP. Subgroup analysis was implemented. The random-effects method was used to implement meta-analysis. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool for prevalence was used to assess risk of bias in the included studies. Result The present systematic review and meta-analysis integrated data from 24 studies, encompassing 4,272,805 participants. The prevalence of SAP was 18.3% (95% CI: 13.7–23.0). Results showed significant heterogeneity among studies regarding…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,272,805 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free