Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes of Inhaled Amikacin in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A group randomized controlled, add-on trial

A. Anwar

Proceedings, 2025

180 participants

Abstract

Background: Many clinical trials support the role of inhaled amikacin when combined with IV antibiotics in eradication of bacterial infections, reduce mortality and improve cure in ICU patients. Local contextual data is limited, leaving research gap.

Objective: To assess the effect of inhaled amikacin as an add-on adjunct to the intravenous antibiotics in ventilator- associated pneumonia ICU patients on clinical outcomes.

Methodology: This group randomized controlled add-on trial was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of inhaled amikacin in VAP treatment. 180 ventilated patients with VAP were recruited from the two Intensive Care Units of Lahore General Hospital Surgical between January to December 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: one received empirical intravenous antibiotics (group N), and the other was administered inhaled amikacin along with empirical intravenous antibiotics (group A). Clinical variables including the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and symptom resolution, were compared between the two groups using t-tests and chi-square tests.

Results: Group A had a statistically significant shorter mean duration of mechanical ventilation than patients in Group N (6.8 days vs. 9.36 days, p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the mean duration of ICU stay between the two groups (13.9 days vs. 14.3 days, p=0.290). Group A had a higher percentage of symptom resolution compared to Group N (88% vs. 57%,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 180 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free