Evidence Hub

Investigating and Comparing the Severity and Prevalence of Ventilator-Induced Pneumonia in Patients Taking Famotidine and Pantoprazole in the Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Trial

Sanaz Omidi, Maryam Shiehmorteza, Amirhossein Ghanbarzamani

Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care, 2025

138 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk of gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal injury and stress ulcers, which may lead to gastrointestinal bleeding, due to their critical condition and use of mechanical ventilation. Stress ulcer prophylaxis drug regimens, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), are commonly used to prevent these complications. However, there are concerns about the side effects of these drugs, including an increased risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This study aimed to compare the effects of pantoprazole and famotidine on clinical outcomes and the risk of VAP in patients admitted to the ICU.

Methods: This study was designed as a single-center randomized clinical trial conducted in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The study population included 138 patients admitted to the ICU who required mechanical ventilation. The treatment regimens studied included two groups: group 1 received intravenous pantoprazole (40 mg daily), and group 2 received intravenous famotidine (20 mg twice daily). The study's primary outcome measure was the incidence of VAP, which was assessed according to ATS/IDSA and CDC guidelines. Other clinical variables included ICU length of stay, APACHE score, and incidence of adverse events.

Results: The results showed that in the famotidine group, ICU length of stay and APACHE II score were significantly shorter than in the pantoprazole group. However,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 138 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free