Evidence Hub

Correspondence about the article “Effect of hydrocortisone on mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia. The REMAP-CAP corticosteroid domain randomized clinical trial”

P. Dequin, Bruno Giraudeau, A. Le Gouge

Intensive Care Medicine, 2025

658 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Adaptive platform trials represent an elegant opportunity to test multiple interventions for the same disease, and the considerable work of the REMAP-CAP consortium to evaluate multiple promising treatments for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) should be commended. However, the recent publication of the fixe-duration hydrocortisone domain [1] raises a few questions. First , due to the open-label nature of the trial, 23% of patients randomized to the standard-of-care group neverthe-less received corticosteroids for a median duration of 4 days. We agreed that it is unlikely that this breach of protocol could have alone reversed the result. However, the median duration of hydrocortisone treatment was only 5 days in the CAPE COD trial, which demonstrated a benefit of hydrocortisone administration [2]. A per-protocol analysis would usefully refine the mortality rate at day 90, according to the treatment received. Second , 658 patients were randomized in 101 centers across 18 countries. It is certainly desirable that patients included in a trial reflect the diversity of their countries’ healthcare systems and income levels. However, this can make it difficult to ensure that the standard-of-care was the same in both groups. Little is known about treatments other than corticosteroids,, with a possible imbalance between groups that may have been favored by the open-label nature of the trial. Third , on average, each center included 6.5 patients, but it is likely that a large number…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 658 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free