Evidence Hub

29-mRNA host response signatures for classification of bacterial infection, viral infection and disease progression in COVID-19 pneumonia: a post hoc analysis of the SAVE-MORE randomized clinical trial

E. Kyriazopoulou, A. Kotsaki, A. Safarika, Garyfallia Poulakou, H. Milionis, S. Metallidis, G. Adamis, A. Fragkou et al.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 2025

471 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Biomarkers based on host response signatures are currently under development for the critically ill. We applied a 29-mRNA classifier for the diagnosis and prognosis of suspected acute infection and sepsis (TriVerity™, Inflammatix Inc.) in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We applied three scores from locked classifiers (IMX-BVN-4 and IMX-SEV-4) from the 29-mRNA TriVerity™ blood test in participants of the SAVE-MORE randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04680949) at baseline and days 4 and 7 of treatment, to classify bacterial infection, viral infection and decompensation. Participants were adults hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels of ≥ 6 ng/ml, randomized to placebo or anakinra treatment. A total of 471 patients were studied. At baseline nearly 90% had a Very Low or Low IMX-BVN-4 Bacterial Score and Moderate, High or Very High IMX-BVN-4 Viral Score. Anakinra treatment had an effect on the expression of genes indicating IMX-SEV-4 High or Very High scores after a 7 day treatment compared to baseline (12.9% of anakinra-treated patients continued being classified as high severity vs 20.4% of placebo-treated patients, p 0.046). The classifiers were well tested in COVID-19 pneumonia and may become a useful tool for hospitalized patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 471 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free