Evidence Hub

Intraoperative tight blood glucose control reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a randomized clinical trial

Daiyu Chen, Siqi Wang, K. Wei, Ju Zhu, Long-Min He, Z. Zou, Yu-Yuan He, Maoji Zhao et al.

Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2025

88 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pneumonia is a common and fatal complication in minimally invasive esophagectomy patients and is related to perioperative blood glucose. This study hypothesized that compared to dealing with intraoperative blood glucose routinely, tight blood glucose control can reduce the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in minimally invasive esophagectomy patients.

METHODS

In this randomized single- blind trial, 88 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the tight blood glucose control (4.4-6.1 mmol/L) or non-tight blood glucose control (blood glucose under 10 mmol/L). The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. The intraoperative insulin-related complications, postoperative inflammation level, blood glucose level, surgical complications, and other secondary outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 88 patients were randomized, and 84 patients were included in the analysis. The intention-to-treat analysis showed the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in the tight blood glucose control group (5 of 44 [11.4%]) was significantly lower than non-tight blood glucose control group (15 of 44 [34.1%]) (OR = 0.569, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.83, P = 0.011). The C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1 was 78.3 (30.4-103.7) in the tight blood glucose control group and 95.6 (79.0-130.5) in the non-tight blood glucose control group (P = 0.008). Compared to the non-tight blood glucose control group (36 of 43 [83.7%]), the demand for advanced antibiotics…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 88 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free