Evidence Hub

Fever Prevention in Patients With Acute Vascular Brain Injury: The INTREPID Randomized Clinical Trial

David M Greer, R. Helbok, Neeraj Badjatia, S. Ko, M. Guanci, K. N. Sheth

Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2024

686 participants · 35 citations

Abstract

Importance

Fever is associated with worse outcomes in patients with stroke, but whether preventing fever improves outcomes is unclear.

Objective

To determine whether fever prevention after acute vascular brain injury is achievable and impacts functional outcome.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment that enrolled 686 of 1176 planned critically ill patients with stroke at 43 intensive care units in 7 countries from March 2017 to April 2021 (last date of follow-up was May 12, 2022).

Intervention

Patients randomized to fever prevention (n = 339) were targeted to 37.0 °C for 14 days or intensive care unit discharge using an automated surface temperature management device. Standard care patients (n = 338) received standardized tiered fever treatment on occurrence of temperature of 38 °C or greater.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcome was daily mean fever burden: the area under the temperature curve above 37.9 °C (total fever burden) divided by the total number of hours in the acute phase, multiplied by 24 hours (°C-hour). The principal secondary outcome was 3-month functional recovery by shift analysis of the 6-category modified Rankin Scale, which is scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). Major adverse events included death, pneumonia, sepsis, and malignant cerebral edema.

Results

Enrollment was stopped after a planned interim analysis demonstrated futility of the principal secondary end point. In total,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 686 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free