Evidence Hub

Fugitive medical and patient-derived aerosol particle distribution following heparin nebulization in patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a secondary analysis of the CHARTER study

M. Walsh, Marc Mac Giolla Eain, R. Macloughlin, J. Laffey, B. McNicholas

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 2024

Abstract

, Aerosolisation is an effective delivery mechanism for direct delivery of therapeutics into the lung and has the potential to reduce systemic side effects. However, the potential for and extent of environmental contamination associated with aerosolisation needs to be determined, particularly whether this is influenced by oxygen delivery devices. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of fugitive medical and patient-derived aerosols around the bed spaces of patients undergoing the management of COVID-19 pneumonia and determine differences in the aerosol particle distribution based on device used for respiratory support. A convenience sample of patients from the ‘Can Nebulised HepArin Reduce acuTE lung injury in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in Ireland (CHARTER-Ireland

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free