Evidence Hub

High-quality targeted temperature management combined with decompressive craniectomy in patients with poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective study

Yang Liu, Bing-Sha Han, Yanru Li, Zhiqiang Ren, Yong Chen, Ming Zhang, Jiao Li, Jv Wang et al.

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

141 participants

Abstract

Background The effect of targeted temperature management (TTM) combined with decompressive craniectomy (DC) on poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has not been previously addressed in the literature. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic outcomes of the combination of TTM and DC in patients with poor-grade aSAH. Methods This study represents a secondary analysis of the Multicenter Clinical Research on Targeted Temperature Management of Poor-grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (High-Quality TTM for PaSAH), a multicenter prospective study conducted in China. The High-Quality TTM for PaSAH study enrolled patients aged 18 years and older who were transported to the intensive care units (ICU) of three tertiary care hospitals in China between April 2022 and April 2024. Among these patients, those who underwent DC were included in the present analysis. Patients were divided into two groups: the DC-alone group and the TTM combined with the DC (TTM-DC) group. The DC-alone group maintained normothermia. The TTM-DC group used automated devices with a temperature feedback system (TFS). TTM was initiated with core temperatures between 36°C-37°C immediately after diagnosing poor-grade aSAH, and concurrent emergency aneurysm repair. This was followed by a rapid induction to 34°C-35°C, maintained for a minimum of 72 h. Subsequently, a slow rewarming process reached 36°C-37°C, which was maintained for at least 48 h. Primary outcomes were evaluated using the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 141 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free