Evidence Hub

Microbiological Analysis of Lower Airway Samples: Does It Influence the Outcome in Patients With Community‐Acquired Pneumonia?

Peter Ellekvist, Hans Johan Niklas Lorentsson, K. Nielsen, Stine Ambeck Kaarsberg, K. B. Pedersen, D. Schmidt, J. Bangsborg, F. B. Hertz et al.

Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica (APMIS), 2025

64 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

This prospective randomized trial examined the impact of extensive lower respiratory tract sampling and microbial analysis on treatment decisions and patient outcomes in community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). One hundred and eighteen patients were randomized to rigorous sampling (intervention group, n = 64) or standard care (control group, n = 54). The primary outcome was antibiotic therapy change based on microbiological results. Secondary outcomes included intravenous therapy duration, hospital stay length, 30‐day mortality, and readmission rate. Unexpectedly, many control group patients underwent sampling at the physician's discretion, making the groups equivalent in sampling frequency. Microbiological analysis led to antibiotic therapy changes in 28% of intervention and 30% of control patients. Overall, 34% of sampled patients had treatment adjustments, generally leading to antibiotic broadening. No significant differences were observed between groups in secondary outcomes. While rigorous sampling did not significantly impact overall patient outcomes, microbiological analysis influenced treatment decisions in a substantial proportion of patients. Future studies should evaluate the effects of sampling for CAP diagnosis in settings where broader‐spectrum antibiotics are the empirical treatment of choice to determine the impact on treatment decisions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 64 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free